Federal lawsuits filed to challenge the use of Zuckerberg’s millions, claim funds used to influence election results in battlefield states

0

The complaints describe how CTCL used the funds to provide “grants” to local councils, which they use to fund electoral activities. These efforts are deliberately targeted at democratic strongholds in order to increase voter turnout in areas that hold overwhelming majorities for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 elections in a clear effort to influence the 2020 national elections.

“The government cannot be busy playing favorites in elections. These targeted monies pay government officials to cast the vote in blue jurisdictions, while governors in those states make it difficult and actually hold polling day in person in more conservative countries. “Territories of States,” explained Phill Kline, the director of the Thomas More Society’s Amistad Project, who represents voters in the four federal lawsuits. “The government, which targets democratic parts of a state to increase voter turnout, while targeting republican areas of the state to make voting more difficult, violates the fundamental premise of American law that we are all equal before the law are, ”he added.

“While Mark Zuckerberg can use its private funds to help voters, these city and county officials cannot use CTCL’s funds to favor one class of electorate over another. America has a dark history of voter suppression before the Voting Rights Act became law. That game manipulation is the other side of the same coin, ”Kline concluded.

So far, CTCL has almost “granted” cumulatively $ 26 million to the defendant cities and districts, which had cast almost 76% of their total of over 2.5 million votes Hillary Clinton in 2016. President Trump won Michigan with 10,704 votes, Minnesota with 44,593 votes, Pennsylvania with 44,292 votes and Wisconsin with 22,748 votes this year.

CTCL is a left-wing electoral activist group promoting large government electoral initiatives in democratic strongholds, raising high alert about the integrity of the November elections and exposing the current threat of allowing private groups to influence elections. The group boasts that its main sources of funding are Google and Facebook, and the group only recently received a contribution from $ 250 million from billionaire Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife.

According to the complaints, the CTCL’s funds are being used for postal and postal voting machines; Satellite voting offices for personal postal voting; personal voting in polling stations on election day; Post boxes, in some cases hundreds, for personal delivery of unmarked postal ballot papers; and voter registration programs. In Michigan The districts that receive funding from CTCL alone can receive up to a $ 100 to $ 1 Funding advantage over counties that rely solely on Michigan Election Commission funds to administer their elections.

“This partisan privatization of our elections cannot stand,” commented Tom Brejcha, the President of the Thomas More Society. “Imagine a future where wealthy individuals can buy county or city voting machines essentially anywhere through such creative grants to achieve their personal goals,” added Brejcha.

The defendants in the federal lawsuits include the cities of East Lansing, Flint, Lansing, and Wayne County/Detroit, Michigan; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Delaware County and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Green bay, Kenosha, Madison, Milwaukee, and Racine, Wisconsin. The plaintiffs are the Minnesota Voters Alliance; the electoral integrity fund (Michigan); several state lawmakers and congressional candidates in Pennsylvania; and the Wisconsin Voters Alliance.

Voting Behavior Summary of Targeted CTCL Jurisdictions – 23.09.20

Place of jurisdiction / city

Grant amount

Trump card

Clinton

Clinton%

Green Bay City, Wisconsin

$ 1,093,400

19,821

21,291

51.79%

Kenosha City, Wisconsin

$ 862,779

15,829

22,849

59.07%

Madison City, Wisconsin

$ 1,271,788

23,053

120,078

83.89%

Milwaukee City, Wisconsin

$ 2,154,500

45.167

188,653

80.68%

City of Racine, Wisconsin

$ 942,100

8,934

19,029

68.05%

Philadelphia City, PA

$ 10,000,000

108,748

584.025

84.30%

Wayne County, MI-Detroit

$ 3,512,000

7,682

234,871

96.83%

Flint City, MI

$ 475,625

4,572

24,790

84.42%

East Lansing, Michigan

$ 8,500

4.147

13,073

75.9%

Lansing, MI

$ 440,000

11,219

32,716

74.46%

Minneapolis City, MN

$ 3,000,000

25,693

174,585

87.17%

Delaware County, PA

$ 2,200,000

110,667

177,402

61.58%

Buzz:

$ 25,960,692

548.373

2,003,237

75.68%

sources
https://www.wpr.org/wisconsin-cities-getting-6-3m-grants-help-elections-during-pandemic
https://elections.wi.gov/node/6993
https://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/wisconsin/
https://detroitmi.gov/sites/detroitmi.localhost/files/2018-05/official-results-nov-8-2016.pdf
https://www.mlive.com/politics/2016/11/michigans_presidential_electio.html
https://www.mlive.com/news/flint/2016/11/donald_trump_beat_hillary_clin.html
https://news.jrn.msu.edu/2016/11/east-lansing-votes-deep-blue-students-prencts-less-certain/
https://www.philadelphiavotes.com/en/resources-a-data/ballot-box-app
Westlaw classic

For more information on this and related topics, please visit: got-freedom.org.

SOURCE Amistad Project

similar links

https://got-freedom.org/

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.